Home
Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances
International Peer reviewed Engineering Journal || Crossref DOI || Impact Factor 8.6 || ISSN: 2582-5003

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research & review articles are invited for publication in September 2026 (Vol. 28, Issue 3) || Submission: up to 28th September || Editorial decision: within 48 hrs.

Framework for incorporating stakeholders’ preferences in lifecycle welding flux design

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Framework for incorporating stakeholders’ preferences in lifecycle welding flux design

Ademola David Adeyeye 1, * and Damola Emmanuel Osinubi 2

Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
 
Research Article
Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2021, 07(02), 012-025.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gjeta.2021.7.2.0064
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2021.7.2.0064
Received on 18 March 2021; revised on 30 April 2021; accepted on 03 May 2021
 
Welding flux design involves optimising multiple quality attributes which are often conflicting and are of varying degree of concern to the stakeholders. The attributes are often selected as design criteria and are sometimes at different levels in the hierarchy such as primary, secondary and tertiary attributes. The articulation and incorporation of the opinions of stakeholders concerning the intensity of importance attached to each attribute at all the levels in the hierarchy in the optimisation process has remained a challenge. In this study, a framework was proposed for the articulation and incorporation of the preferences of stakeholders concerning all levels of attributes and illustrated with a lifecycle welding flux design case from the literature involving 5, 21 and 25 primary, secondary and tertiary criteria, respectively. Fifteen out of the 21 secondary criteria could not be further unbundled and were added to the tertiary criteria to make 40 lowest level criteria. The subjective judgements of stakeholders were converted to weighting coefficients using the analytical hierarchy process. The coefficients for the lowest level criteria were converted to global weights (WGC)which were the preference indices for use in the optimisation models. Based on the values of WGC, moisture pick-up, extrudability and slag detachability were ranked 1st , 2nd , and 3rd respectively and the respective 38th, 39th and 40th lowest level criteria were fume generation, dilution and charpy impart strength. 
Relative importance; Multiple response optimization; Design objectives; Sub-criteria; Welding flux quality optimization; Analytical hierarchy process
 
https://gjeta.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GJETA-2021-0064.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Ademola David Adeyeye and Damola Emmanuel Osinubi. Framework for incorporating stakeholders’ preferences in lifecycle welding flux design. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2021, 7(2), 012-025. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2021.7.2.0064

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

          

 

Copyright © 2026 Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution